bone quality and bone strength

Thin but strong — determining bone quality in thinner women

It’s well known that there’s a direct correlation between bone density and body weight. Thin people generally get lower bone density readings on DEXA scans, and as a group, people whose body mass index classifies them as underweight” experience more hip fractures than persons of normal” weight. But it’s still possible to have a slender build with bone density readings on the low side yet still enjoy enhanced bone quality with plenty of bone strength.

Let’s look at this in detail.

Bone density isn’t the same as bone strength 

We know that bone adapts to the total weight put upon it. With every step, a heavier person shows the body the need for a certain degree of bone mass just to carry that body around, and the body in all its intelligence adjusts to that need. Lighter folks, on the other hand, do not require the same bone mass to carry them around, and nature adjusts to that also.

But when it comes to bone strength and fracture resistance, other factors aside from bone size and bone density come into play. Specifically, key factors are the amount of lean muscle mass and variations in bone quality.

For example, a healthy, small framed, thin person with good muscle mass may have the bone strength of a healthy heavier person, even though their bone density is reported to lower. Or, a small-framed person with a low bone density reading can enjoy good bone strength if quality of the bone is high. As I reported before, a case in point are Asian Americans, who as a rule have lower bone density than other ethnic groups, yet they have much lower fracture rates.

Factors that determine bone quality

Over the years, hundreds of low-weight, small-framed women have come to The Center for Better Bones because they have been told they have extremely low bone density and warned to take bone drugs if they want to avoid a fracture. Over and over I soothe their anxieties by explaining that what’s paramount is their total load” of fracture risk factors — and not the results of a single bone density scan. I often find that these women are not living a bone-wasting lifestyle,” have few fracture risk factors, and have no hidden secondary causes of osteoporosis — and to top it off, their bone density is stable and they have good muscle development. So it’s likely that their bone, though low in density, is high in quality and strength.

Science has yet to discover a noninvasive way to assess bone quality and thus determine skeletal strength. However, we know that a variety of important factors that help determine bone quality as you can see in the graphic below.

bone quality chart


















I should mention that it’s not just women who experience these false positives” in bone density testing. You might recall the blog I wrote some months ago about “Richard, a man who sought my services because his doctor told him to take bone drugs due to his low bone density. After carefully reviewing his case, I could find no risk factors to make me think he was at risk of osteoporotic fractures — he was a healthy, strong man who nevertheless was naturally small-framed and slim, the likely reason for his low bone density reading.

Richard sought a second opinion from a bone specialist who was also an academic researcher. After a thorough examination, this physician also surmised that maybe it was just his weight and body size that was the issue and reran his bone density numbers as if he were a woman… and the osteoporosis diagnosis disappeared. As a researcher, she had access to a sophisticated scanning device that provided a 3-D image of his bones, which confirmed her view that he had healthy bones. Her only follow-up suggestion was to do another bone density test next year to see whether the numbers are moving.

Pay attention to all fracture risk factors, not just bone density

When I encounter someone who has been frightened by a finding of low bone density, the one positive about the fear instilled in my clients by their doctor is that these women (and men!) are now motivated to implement all six steps of our natural Better Bones Better Program®. Anyone of any body size who strives for longevity would do well to develop a comprehensive lifestyle and nutrition program to maintain lifelong bone strength.


Bone quality references

Brown, Susan E. Helping thin women reduce bone fracture risk.

Beck, T., et al. Does obesity really make the femur stronger? BMD, geometry and fracture incidence in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. J Bone Miner Res2009;24(8):1369-1379.

vitamin D prevent fracture

Don’t be fooled: Vitamin D does prevent fracture

I recently recorded a Facebook Live video critiquing a new study that suggested vitamin D does not prevent bone fracture. This study was published in The Lancet in October 2018 and was clearly flawed in many ways. For those of you who did not catch my video commentary on the shortcomings of this study, I summarize them here.

Not all studies are created equal

I’ve been looking at the research on vitamin D for almost 30 years. It’s been clear for quite some time that you can reduce fracture risk with vitamin D if you obtain the therapeutic level of 32 ng/mL in your blood. So why would the new study claim that vitamin D doesn’t work to lower fracture risk?

To put it simply, the new study used a lot of vitamin D data that just wasn’t very good to start with. As a meta-analysis, it mined data from 80 studies on vitamin D from the past 20 to 30 years. But the problem is that most of these studies were flawed in the following ways:

They were mostly evaluating low doses of vitamin D (400–800 IU) that we know to be too low to affect fracture risk.

Many of them were too small and too short in duration to really assess the effectiveness of an intervention with vitamin D.

To be valuable, the study must document not only how much the participants took, but also whether they reached the therapeutic level. The vast majority of the studies didn’t report what blood level their participants reached—so none of them can say for sure that their participants had adequate vitamin D levels, particularly since few of them assessed the starting blood levels.

In those studies that did give higher doses of vitamin D, most of the time it was supplied in a single bolus of 100,000–300,000 units — which has been shown to be ineffective. To be most effective, the vitamin D dose should be given daily and it should always be given in the form of a natural vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol), not vitamin D2 (ergocalciferol).

The standard treatment for vitamin D deficiency uses 7,000 IU of vitamin D daily for 8 weeks, followed by testing of the new vitamin D level. Then the appropriate, long-term dose of vitamin D is determined. This is a dose that would provide at least a 32 ng/mL blood level of vitamin D, the minimum needed for health, with the goal of reaching an ideal range from 50–60 ng/mL.

Once vitamin D deficiency has been corrected, most individuals require 3000–4000 IU (or more) supplemental vitamin D daily to maintain an optimum blood level.

When you look at the data the study used, it’s pretty clear that this recent metanalysis is seriously flawed, and that the author’s conclusion that vitamin D is of no use in fracture prevention is both irresponsible and harmful.

So don’t be fooled — the value of vitamin D, established over many years of good research, is no different in 2018 than it was in 2008, when I first published my research review article on the subject.


Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on musculoskeletal health: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and trial sequential analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Published online October 04, 2018. DOI:

Brown SE. Vitamin D and fracture reduction: An evaluation of the existing research. Altern Med Rev. 2008;13(1): 21-33.

woman looking at her tablet computer

Quiz: How well do you know the factors of bone fracture risk?

According to the National Osteoporosis Foundation, up to one-half of women age 50+ will experience a bone fracture during the remainder of their lifetime. This means a lot of women will fracture, so it’s important to familiarize yourself with the better-documented fracture risk factors. Over the years, researchers have tried to quantify how much any factor increases the risk of bone fracture. Test your knowledge by taking this little quiz on 7 major risk factors — then check our chart below for the full list!

powered by Typeform

Chart: Top 7 bone fracture risk factors

Our quiz was just a fun way to enter this topic, but here’s a chart that you should take to heart. Look over the top 7 risk factors for bone fracture, ranked by risk ratio. This measure of “relative risk” represents the likelihood of a certain event happening in one group compared to the risk of the same event happening in another group.

Risk factorRisk ratio
Glucocorticoids (steroids)2.31
Parental hip fracture2.27
Low BMI (20 vs. 25)1.95
Rheumatoid arthritis1.95
Prior fragility fracture1.85
Current smoking1.84
High alcohol intake1.68

Are you concerned about risk factors that may be present in your life? Begin by assessing your personal health and lifestyle factors with our free Bone Health Profile. As we at the Center for Better Bones like to say, “It is never too late to begin building and rebuilding bone strength.”

Take action today!


Susan Ott, M.D.  Website

thin women and bone fracture

Helping thin women reduce their fracture risk

The saying,  “You can never be too rich or too thin” is definitely not true when it comes to bone health! It’s well established that women with low body weight have lower bone density and are at increased risk for many types of fracture.

Let’s better understand this link between body weight and fracture risk and then look at the many steps thinner women can take to start strengthening their bones.

 Underweight women…

  • Experience twice the rate of hip fracture as do “healthy weight” women.  (See chart below.)
  • Have lower hip bone density, lower cross-sectional bone area, and less bone bending strength than “normal” weight women.
  • Experience more vertebral and wrist fractures (but fewer lower leg fractures).
  • Tend to lose more bone during the menopause transition than do heavier women.

So just who is included in this “underweight” category?

The “underweight” designation is determined by body mass index (BMI) using weight and height. A BMI of 18.5 or less (which would translate into a 5’3” women weighing 105 lbs or less, or a 5’5” person weighing 115 lbs or less) is considered underweight.

While the “underweight” category includes only very thin folks, there exists a weight–bone gradient link whereby lighter weight individuals have both decreased bone density and increased risk of various fractures.  Those falling into the “underweight” category are at highest risk, but slender individuals (that is, those whose BMI is 18.6–21.5) are often reported to be at increased fracture risk, too, particularly if they also have low muscle mass.

How can underweight or slender women reduce their fracture risk?

This is indeed a complicated topic, which I can only begin to address here. As always, at the Center for Better Bones we look for the root cause of the problem and seek a solution with this in mind. Being significantly underweight likely indicates a serious imbalance within the system, such as digestive, emotional, or disease-related issues:

  • Low body weight is often associated with weak digestion, food allergies, or food intolerances. Addressing these issues is central to improving your metabolism. Check out our 10 steps to stronger digestion and try a simple elimination diet.
  • Clinically, I also see low body weight associated with a tendency towards anxiety, nervousness, and at times even straight out emotional distress and fear. While uprooting these negative emotional responses can take some time and good guidance, a good place to begin is with our free e-book, 7 secrets to reducing stress.
  • If you’re an “eat-and-run” person or you regularly skip meals, discipline yourself to sit down, relax, and consume three tasty, wholesome meals every day.
  • Try not to get extra calories from simple carbohydrates like sugars, pastas, and flours. Instead, increase your intake of root crops and wholesome fats like avocado, nuts, seeds, and olive oil.
  • Remember, bone and muscle are built together — so include some weight-bearing, muscle-building exercise in your weekly routine.

As you can see, there’s a lot that a thin, small-framed person can do to strengthen bone and reduce their fracture risk.  Being aware of your risk is the important first step!

Take this survey to help us see how body mass relates to fracture incidence among the Better Bones, Better Body Community. We’ll report back on what we find!

powered by Typeform


Johansson, H. et al. A meta‐analysis of the association of fracture risk and body mass index in women. J Bone Miner Res., 2014;29: 223-233. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2017

Søgaard AJ, et al. Abdominal obesity increases the risk of hip fracture. A population‐based study of 43 000 women and men aged 60–79 years followed for 8 years. Cohort of Norway. J Intern Med. 2015;277: 306–317.

Compston, J. E., et al. Relationship of weight, height, and body mass index with fracture risk at different sites in postmenopausal women: The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW). J Bone Miner Res. 2014;29: 487-493. doi:10.1002/jbmr.2051

5 ways to prevent a second fracture

Make Your First Fracture Your Last Fracture

Low-trauma fracture, rather than low bone density, is what indicates bone weakness — so if you’ve had a fracture, it’s a sign you need to take substantial, comprehensive steps to support your bones. Even a simple fracture of the wrist after stumbling tells a story — and what’s been shown over and over by research is that a person who’s had a previous fracture is at higher risk of future fractures (Johansson et al. 2017; Ferrari 2017; Gehlbach et al 2012).

Many international osteoporosis organizations have also reached this conclusion and have begun to recommend intervention after the first low-trauma fracture. The International Osteoporosis Foundation has developed the Europe-wide “Capture the Fracture” promotion, and Osteoporosis Canada a few years ago identified a significant post-fracture care gap. Both agencies, unfortunately, focus on moving fracture patients into a system of bone drug treatment.

5 steps to prevent a second fracture

At the Center for Better Bones, our approach to bone fracture prevention is fundamentally different. We view fractures that occur without high impact as very serious warning signs that are worthy of further investigation. We go about the goal of preventing a second fracture in a systematic fashion:

Step 1: Assess bone health

We guide individuals into assessing health and lifestyle factors that might be weakening their bones. A good way to begin this assessment is with our Bone Health Profile.

Step 2. Uncover causes of bone fragility

We encourage everyone who has fractured to ask their doctor for selected medical tests that help uncover hidden medical causes of bone fragility via a comprehensive osteoporosis work-up. The work-up offers direct data on possible health and lifestyle issues that may be contributing to your fracture risk.

Step 3. Address hidden medical issues

We review the results from your doctor’s medical testing, and if any hidden medical causes of bone weakening are uncovered, we help you understand them while your doctor treats these medical concerns.

Step 4.  Reduce or eliminate fracture risk factors 

We work with the client on the lifestyle and nutrition assessments to identify areas of lifestyle, diet, and emotional makeup that could be improved, with the goal of either eliminating these fracture risk factors or reducing their effects on your bones.

Step 5. Create a personalized plan for stronger bones

Based on our full assessment of the individual case and total load of fracture risk factors, we develop a personalized Better Bones, Better Body program to help modify lifestyle and nutritional factors and develop a strong nutrient supplement regimen to support stronger bones and reduce your future fracture risk.

Your bones are as unique as you are

In my experience, carefully evaluating each case and working with the body’s natural processes to regain optimal bone health offers far greater long-term benefits to health and longevity than any quick fix using bone drugs. This natural approach, however, requires a substantial level of commitment and a willingness to change one’s diet, lifestyle, and daily habits. As the old Chinese saying puts it: “If you keep going in the same direction, you will end up right where you are headed.”

There are undoubtedly extreme and severe case where bone drugs are deemed appropriate by both physician and patient, and in these cases, for optimum results we incorporate the complete Better Bones Better Body Program along with the bone drug.

So if you or someone you know has recently had a fracture, take heart — and take action! — to make this first fracture your only fracture.

Ferrari SL. Prevention of fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Lancet 2017; (published online November 9, 2017).

Gehlbach S, Saag KG, Adachi JD, et al. Previous fractures at multiple sites increase the risk for subsequent fractures: The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(3):645–653. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1476.

Johansson H, Siggeirsdóttir K, Harvey NC, et al. Imminent risk of fracture after fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(3):775–780. doi:10.1007/s00198-016-3868-0.

mind body bone connection

Mind over muscle — how using your brain could help your bones

Perhaps you’ve heard of the “placebo effect” in clinical trials — that strange situation when some people who don’t receive a beneficial intervention see a benefit to their health anyway, for no obvious reason. By way of explanation, most clinical researchers think that when participants believe they will improve because of the “treatment,” their body takes its cue from the mind and responds as if a therapeutic agent is actually being used.

If only we could capture this seemingly magical ability of the mind to direct the body — what could it do for our own ability to heal?

Mental imagery makes a difference

In fact, a few years ago, some researchers showed that we can capture this ability (Clark et al. 2014). They induced muscle weakness in 29 adult volunteers — healthy people who had more or less similar muscle strength at baseline — by immobilizing the hand and wrist of the subjects’ non-dominant arm using a rigid cast (15 other volunteers had nothing done to their arm and served as controls). They trained 14 members of the group with immobilized wrists in a mental imagery program in which they were told to imagine their immobilized hand and wrist was doing specific movements, such as flexing and pushing, without actually activating the muscles. An electromyogram was used to make sure they didn’t actually flex their muscles during the mental imagery sessions. The remaining 15 people whose arms were immobilized were not given mental imagery training.

What they found was startling: In the participants who underwent mental imagery training, the loss of muscle strength associated with immobilization was half that of those who didn’t get training. They also concluded that lack of neurological activity, rather than lack of muscle activity, accounted for almost a one-third of the strength decrease in the immobilized arm. In other words, simply directing the brain’s attention to the nervous system in a specific part of the body provides sufficient stimulus to the musculoskeletal system to make an important difference.

A mind-body-bone connection?

I’ve noted before that bone strength depends on muscle strength, and most of us know that muscle strength is a “use it or lose it” proposition. This study shows how the power of the mind can be brought to bear on muscle strength — and though it didn’t look at bone specifically, if you’re supporting muscle, you’re also supporting bone. I can’t help but wonder whether a study that also looked at the effects on participants’ bone mass might not show a similar improvement in bones! I bet you dollars to donuts it would.

Better bones affirmations

Better bones affirmations


Clark BC, Mahato NK, Nakazawa M, Law TD, Thomas JS. The power of the mind: the cortex as a critical determinant of muscle mass. J Neurophysiol. 2014;112(12):3219–3226.

5 differences between arthritis and vertebral fracture

Arthritis or fracture? Figuring out what back pain means

It’s an unusual person who gets to middle age without a few aches and pains — a little wear and tear is to be expected after a half century or so. But for those at risk of osteoporotic fractures, back pain is particularly worrisome because you can’t really know whether it’s tired muscles, or arthritis, or a vertebral fracture.

Or can you?

Recent research shows that the pain caused by vertebral fractures is different from other causes, such as arthritis of the spine. As a 2016 study published in Osteoporosis International found, vertebral fractures in women produced a number of distinct pain signposts that weren’t present in women who had arthritis of the spinal column.

Recognizing the signs of vertebral fracture vs. arthritis pain

The study looked at 197 British women between the ages of 67 and 84, asking them to report on their experiences of pain (in the back but elsewhere as well) before initiating a spine x-ray to look for vertebral fractures. They found that about a third of the women had vertebral fractures — and the women with fractures had a number of things in common. They were older (average age of 76.9 years versus 71.7 in the women without fractures), were considerably more likely to have had a previous fracture, or a diagnosis of osteoporosis, or both, and had fairly specific attributes to the pain they experienced that differed from the women with arthritis.

Most notably, women with fractures described their pain as recent and brief in duration but “crushing,” whereas women with arthritis said they had intermittent or periodic pain that they were more likely to call “taut” or “sharp.” Radiation of pain to the legs and association with weather changes were common in the women with arthritis but not the women with vertebral fractures. (See table for full comparison.)

Listening to your body

All of this makes sense. Fractures are an acute injury in the bone, which is very different from the kind of slow, gradual, and chronic inflammatory process that is present in arthritis.

What I take away from this study is that our body will tell us what we need to know — if we listen carefully. To start learning more about your bone health and risk for fracture, I encourage you to take our quick and easy Bone Health Profile.

Table: Women’s experience of vertebral fracture pain

Vertebral fractureArthritis
Risk factors
  • Older age
  • Previous fracture (nonvertebral)
  • Diagnosis of osteoporosis
Duration of painShort-term, recent (occurring within days or weeks of the study); episodes are brief or transient with no apparent patternLong-term (present months or years prior to study); episodes are “periodic” or intermittent
Type of pain“Crushing” but localizedPain description varies but it is ongoing or intermittent and may occur anywhere from neck to legs
  • Relieved by lying down
  • Does not radiate to legs
  • No obvious association to weather or temperature
  • No clear effect on pain of keeping still or moving
  • May radiate to legs
  • Some associations with cold, damp, or changing weather conditions
Vertebral Fracture vs Arthritis

Vertebral Fracture vs Arthritis


Clark EM, Gooberman-Hill R, Peter TJ. Using self-reports of pain and other variables to distinguish between older women with back pain due to vertebral fractures and those with back pain due to degenerative changes. Osteoporos Int 2016;27:1459–1467.

4 tips to free yourself from stress and worry

High perceived stress level increases fracture risk

Do you think you’re a stressed-out person? I certainly think I am — which is one reason I’m so interested in the results of a new Danish study looking at perceived stress and fracture risk.

Not only did the study find that high-stressed participants had a 68% increased risk of hip fracture and a 37% increased risk of any osteoporotic fracture. The research also suggests that it’s not just the stress itself, but our perception of that stress that’s important.

The study determined this with nearly 8,000 Danish adults age 55+ who were categorized according to their self-perceived level of stress. Note that the researchers didn’t try to measure the level or type of stress itself! Instead, they asked the individual participants to describe what their level of stress was — then watched to see who in the cohort experienced an osteoporotic fracture over the next five years.

The one-fourth of people who reported a “high” level of perceived stress had the significantly increased risk of fractures – again a 68% increased risk of hip fracture and a 37% increased risk of any osteoporotic fracture – compared to those who reported “low” perceived stress.

How to free yourself from worry and stress

I’m quick to identify myself with that high-risk cohort. My mother dubbed me her “worry wart” and that personality trait still challenges me today.

That’s why I took up meditation and have developed various methods to “dial down” my perception of stress. A favorite self-help approach is what I call the “BE FREE” method. Those of you who are also “worry warts” might give it a try.

  • BreathE: Throughout the day, I consciously try to stop what I’m doing and slow down my breathing. Just two or three slow, deep breaths offer a calming chance for the more rational part of my brain to kick in. This exercise is all the more important when I find myself in a stressful situation.
  • Feel: Once I’m quieted down, I focus my attention inward, telling myself to note the emotional response I am feeling—fear, anger, frustration, jealousy, or whatever. I just allow myself to feel that particular energy.
  • RElease: Next, I intentionally release the negative emotion, and the energy behind it dissipates. I can feel my heartbeat slow, and the anxiety-producing stress hormones begin to quiet down.
  • Envision: Still taking deep, conscious breaths, I asked myself, “How do I want to feel?” or “How do I want to be?” Then I envision that desired energy flowing through my body.

If you give it a try, let me know how my “BE FREE” method worked for you. Even more, perhaps you’d like to share some of your personal methods and tips for maintaining resilience amid the ups, downs and of modern life. I would love to hear about them!


Pedersen AB, Baggesen LM, Ehrenstein V, et al. Perceived stress and risk of any osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporosis International, 2016;27:2035–2043.

Wrist fracture and future fracture risk

What your wrist fracture may be telling you

How many of you have fallen and thrown out your hands to catch yourself?  It’s probably happened to most us, and may be one reason that in the U.S., 1 in 10 broken bones is a broken wrist.

But wrist fractures aren’t just due to accidents. Wrist fractures that occur from a fall from standing height are generally a sign of bone weakness and are the most common osteoporotic fractures.

Having seen my grandmother experience first a wrist fracture, then a collarbone fracture, and finally a hip fracture, I suspected that wrist fractures — common in middle-aged and older women — are an important sign that attention should be given to strengthening bone.

Wrist fractures signal increased fracture risk

And there’s a recent study out that confirms this suspicion. In a 2015 study from the Journal of Bone and Mineral Research (Crandall et al., 2015), the study authors looked at long-term data from more than 160,000 women and found that women who’d previously had a wrist fracture were at significantly higher risk of other fractures during the almost 12 years of follow-up — regardless of other osteoporosis risk factors.

The big news . . .  the younger the woman was when she fractured her wrist, the greater her relative risk of having another fracture later on.

I like to say, make your first fracture your last fracture. If you’ve fractured a wrist in the past, be aware that this fracture is your “canary in the coal mine” telling you to pay attention to your bones. You can take the Better Bones Profile to assess the health of your bones and your potential risk of fracture.

Crandall, C. J., Hovey, K. M., Cauley, J. A., Andrews, C. A., Curtis, J. R., Wactawski-Wende, J., Wright, N. C., Li, W., and LeBoff, M. S. Wrist fracture and risk of subsequent fractures: Findings from the Women’s Health Initiative Study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 2015;30:2086–2095.

21 drugs that increase fracture risk

Medication use and osteoporotic fracture

Are you taking medications that could increase your risk of osteoporotic fracture? Many people are – even after they’ve suffered a fracture – according to a recent article about osteoporotic fractures and medication use from the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Scientists looked at 168,000 Medicare beneficiaries who experienced osteoporotic fractures of the hip, shoulder, or wrist. They found that 75% of these patients had actually been taking one or more medications known to increase fracture risk.

Drugs known to increase fracture risk

In the study, 21 classes of drugs were associated with increased fracture risk. Some of the drugs known to increase fracture risk include:

  • Glucocorticoid steroids (e.g., prednisone)
  • Serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (antidepressants)
  • Antacids (proton pump inhibitors and aluminum-containing antacids)
  • Blood pressure medicines
  • Antipsychotics
  • Thyroid hormone (when dosed in excess of need)
  • Anti-seizure medications
  • Anti-estrogen breast cancer drugs
  • Anti-testosterone prostate cancer drugs
  • DepoProvera
  • Sedatives (benzodiazepines)
  • Opiate pain killers, morphine
  • Acetaminophen if used long term
  • Diabetes medications (thiazolidinediones)
  • Heparin, long term use

What can you do to reduce your bone health risks from medications?

The authors of the study were struck by the fact that even after fracturing, patients did not stop using their bone-damaging medication. One obvious helpful suggestion from this study is for doctors to provide alternative medications that damage bone less. Here are other ideas for creating lifelong bone health:

  • When a drug therapy is recommended, dig a little deeper! Learn more about your health condition and how it’s related to lifestyle and nutrition.
  • Use the medication for the shortest period possible. When you need medication for a chronic condition, work with your doctor to minimize the dose or find a less bone-damaging alternative.
  • Study how others with this ailment have regained health using natural, life-supporting alternatives to drug therapy, including exercise, nutritional strategies, and methods that strengthen the mind–body connection.
  • Look into the more holistic health approaches, such as functional medicine, acupuncture and traditional Chinese medicine, classic homeopathy, chiropractic, and massage.

If you’re concerned about your risk for fracture and other bone health issues, take a moment to learn more about my natural Better Bones Program.



Munson, JC et al. Patterns of prescription drug use before and after fragility fracture. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176(10):1531-1538.